hear the news

The High Court finally reserved the verdict on the bail of Umar Khalid, accused in the Delhi riots case, after a more than four-month-long hearing. Khalid has challenged the decision of the trial court rejecting his bail application in the High Court. The debate in this matter went on for more than 20 days.

A division bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajneesh Bhatnagar reserved its verdict after hearing Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Amit Prasad for the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Tridip Paes, senior advocate for Khalid.

The debate on Khalid’s bail began in April and in the very first hearing, judges remarked that they found his speech in Amravati unpleasant and provocative. The court also said that the speech may have been spontaneous in isolation but the bugle call could have been something bigger.

He questioned Paes as to what Khalid meant when he used words like Inquilab and Krantikari. Ultimately the hearing went on for over 20 days, leading the bench to also remark that it appeared that they were hearing an appeal against a conviction and not a bail issue.

Khalid’s lawyer argued

Senior advocate Tridip Paes, appearing for Khalid, argued that the special court has not made any conclusion that his speech in Amaravati was provocative. Phrases like ‘Sab chaga si’ used by Khalid in his speech are meant as a satire and no person can be put behind bars for more than 500 days because he used the phrase or because he used the phrase. word was used. Khalid is not named in any of the FIRs related to violence during the riots, but an FIR was registered against him after police viewed footage of his speech on Republic TV and News18.

SPP Amit Prasad said that Umar Khalid’s membership of various WhatsApp groups whose members have been arrested for violence in Delhi was a common conspiracy behind the riots and Khalid was one of its masterminds. The speeches of Umar Khalid and others had similar themes of Kashmir, triple talaq and CAA/NRC. Its purpose was to create a sense of fear among the minority community.

All were part of different accused groups, met and conspired several times. His attempt was to destabilize the country and tarnish its image in the international media and in front of international leaders including the then US President Donald Trump. Khalid and others were managing each protest site, including Shaheen Bagh, and the effort was to create discontent among the minorities.

Khalid was arrested in 2020

Khalid was arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020 and has been charged with criminal conspiracy, rioting, unlawful assembly as well as several sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. His bail plea was rejected by the Karkardooma Court in March this year.

Expansion

The High Court finally reserved the verdict on the bail of Umar Khalid, accused in the Delhi riots case, after a more than four-month-long hearing. Khalid has challenged the decision of the trial court rejecting his bail application in the High Court. The debate in this matter went on for more than 20 days.

A division bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajneesh Bhatnagar reserved its verdict after hearing Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Amit Prasad for the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Tridip Paes, senior advocate for Khalid.

The debate on Khalid’s bail began in April and in the very first hearing, judges remarked that they found his speech in Amravati unpleasant and provocative. The court also said that the speech may have been spontaneous in isolation but the bugle call could have been something bigger.

He questioned Paes as to what Khalid meant when he used words like Inquilab and Krantikari. Ultimately the hearing went on for over 20 days, leading the bench to also remark that it appeared that they were hearing an appeal against a conviction and not a bail issue.

Khalid’s lawyer argued

Senior advocate Tridip Paes, appearing for Khalid, argued that the special court has not made any conclusion that his speech in Amaravati was provocative. Phrases like ‘Sab chaga si’ used by Khalid in his speech are meant as a satire and no person can be put behind bars for more than 500 days because he used the phrase or because he used the phrase. word was used. Khalid is not named in any of the FIRs related to violence during the riots, but an FIR was registered against him after police viewed footage of his speech on Republic TV and News18.

SPP Amit Prasad said that Umar Khalid’s membership of various WhatsApp groups whose members have been arrested for violence in Delhi was a common conspiracy behind the riots and Khalid was one of its masterminds. The speeches of Umar Khalid and others had similar themes of Kashmir, triple talaq and CAA/NRC. Its purpose was to create a sense of fear among the minority community.

All were part of different accused groups, met and conspired several times. His attempt was to destabilize the country and tarnish its image in the international media and in front of international leaders including the then US President Donald Trump. Khalid and others were managing each protest site, including Shaheen Bagh, and the effort was to create discontent among the minorities.

Khalid was arrested in 2020

Khalid was arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020 and has been charged with criminal conspiracy, rioting, unlawful assembly as well as several sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. His bail plea was rejected by the Karkardooma Court in March this year.

,

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.