hear the news

The Supreme Court has closed contempt proceedings against former Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and his son and former deputy CM Sukhbir Singh Badal in a case related to the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal issue. The matter came up for hearing on Tuesday before a bench of Justice SK Kaul, Justice AS Oka and Justice Vikram Nath.

The bench said that keeping in view certain statements made by the political systems, it was held that the apex court should take suo motu cognizance and initiate contempt proceedings. The bench said in its order that we have sent the matter for arbitration. If necessary, the court will execute the order. If this Court feels that some contempt proceedings are to be initiated by taking suo motu cognizance, it shall decide.

Badal father-son had said, will not allow the Supreme Court’s decision to be implemented
For all these purposes, we do not think that the assistance of the applicant would be required, the court said. Accordingly the contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt notice is dismissed. The counsel appearing for the petitioner alleged that the then Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab had given statements that they would not allow the Supreme Court’s decision in the SYL case to be implemented. Earlier on Tuesday, the Center told the Supreme Court that the Punjab government was not cooperating in resolving the decades-old SYL canal dispute.

The top court observed that water is a natural resource and living beings should learn to share it. It said the parties need to take a comprehensive approach. It made a clear reference to the occasional incidents of violence over the project, saying that in view of the security concerns, the parties have to understand the implications and need for a negotiated solution. The counsel for Punjab told the bench that the state government was keen to resolve the issue amicably.

Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, told the bench at the beginning of the hearing that the apex court had said in 2017 that the issue should be resolved amicably and the Union of India, through the Ministry of Water Resources, would seek an amicable solution. Trying to bring the states of Haryana and Punjab together for the purpose of evacuation. Venugopal said that it is unfortunate that Punjab is not cooperating. Letters were sent to the then Chief Minister of Punjab in 2020 and 2021, but did not get any response.

Expansion

The Supreme Court has closed contempt proceedings against former Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and his son and former deputy CM Sukhbir Singh Badal in a case related to the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal issue. The matter came up for hearing on Tuesday before a bench of Justice SK Kaul, Justice AS Oka and Justice Vikram Nath.

The bench said that keeping in view certain statements made by the political systems, it was held that the apex court should take suo motu cognizance and initiate contempt proceedings. The bench said in its order that we have sent the matter for arbitration. If necessary, the court will execute the order. If this Court feels that some contempt proceedings are to be initiated by taking suo motu cognizance, it shall decide.

Badal father-son had said, will not allow the Supreme Court’s decision to be implemented

For all these purposes, we do not think that the assistance of the applicant would be required, the court said. Accordingly the contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt notice is dismissed. The counsel appearing for the petitioner alleged that the then Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab had given statements that they would not allow the Supreme Court’s decision in the SYL case to be implemented. Earlier on Tuesday, the Center told the Supreme Court that the Punjab government was not cooperating in resolving the decades-old SYL canal dispute.

The top court observed that water is a natural resource and living beings should learn to share it. It said the parties need to take a comprehensive approach. It made a clear reference to the occasional incidents of violence over the project, saying that in view of the security concerns, the parties have to understand the implications and need for a negotiated solution. The counsel for Punjab told the bench that the state government was keen to resolve the issue amicably.

Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, told the bench at the beginning of the hearing that the apex court had said in 2017 that the issue should be resolved amicably and the Union of India, through the Ministry of Water Resources, would seek an amicable solution. Trying to bring the states of Haryana and Punjab together for the purpose of evacuation. Venugopal said that it is unfortunate that Punjab is not cooperating. Letters were sent to the then Chief Minister of Punjab in 2020 and 2021, but did not get any response.

,

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.